![]() |
|
|
|
|
10. Polyphonic Spree
Has there ever been in a band in pop music who is more deserving of the pejorative adjective "mawkish" than the Polyphonic Spree? Constituted in some ostensible negative taste in the air, The Polyphonic Spree typically saw itself as some reaction to this negativity they made up to react to. The essence of this band is a blind naïve optimism that is supposed to represent a more primal intuition for loves and hugs. Draped in white dresses and jumping around like grade school children, The Polyphonic Spree gave a new definition to what bombastic music was, which is nothing other than not recognizing how bombastic your actually being in thinking your movement where everyone can sing and shout together is genuine…like children. Backed by a multitude of vocalists and instrument players, the Polyphonic Spree played faux-orchestral music within hackneyed major scales and the most banal of feel-good platitudes that was to fool the listener into hearing simplicity. Never saying anything important and certainly never sounding important, this bombast would fall only on easily fooled ears, who would then be easily fooled by the next band who publicly expressed its shiny happy love for the universe. Indie music in general had fallen for this conscious phase and showed why any merit the genre had ever garnered had only been from the advent of the coming-of-age "I wanna be me" attitude, in the case, where supposed optimism had sprung its puerile head from the ground to see if anyone was watching. For those who actually listened to music though, only one word would stand out in their head when listening to the Polyphonic Spree…tacky. 9. Can
![]() 8. Franz Ferdinand
![]() 7. The Brian Jonestown Massacre
![]() There has never been a band in the history of pop music who cashed in on the success of a film about them as much as the Brian Jonestown Massacre has. A band with players who can't play their instruments, no appearant melodic choruses, and a singer who can't carry a tune in reasonable pitch for the life of him, Brian Jonestown Massacre owed its success to the exaggeration of difference as the standard for quality in music. To show how flexible difference could be conceptually qualified, BJM exemplifies this more than any other band, because they actually never made a unique sound in their life. They were championed for being different from the immediate times, in their obsequious disposition towards 60's flower pop. It's one thing to ape decent bands from the past, its another to ape them and make them sound worse. It's with the popularity of drug addiction as authenticity and incandescent pictures in music magazines that BJM became popular. This medium became focused in a movie about them and the Dandy Warhols called "Dig!". The sheer amount of people who obviously knew nothing about music but would claim BJM as "the next Dylan" in every video shot had proved that no other band had come as close to BJM in being this mythologized. The idea that something would be good in the first place because it's the "next Dylan" goes to show how inconsequential these managers and A and R types are in knowing anything about music besides quixotic headlines in a band's profile in a modern music magazine. If you don't believe me on the quality of BJM's music though, don't take my word for it and go see them live. I'm pretty sure your first band you started in 8th grade sounds as sonically coherent as this band on their best day.
6. The Cure
![]() The Cure had a resurgence in popularity in the past 2 years mainly from children below the age of 17 who identified bright lipstick with interesting music. Interesting music was supposed to be the selling point for The Cure who wore its theatrical badge on its sleeve as publicly as Fred Astaire liked cajoling single women. The Cure, always failing to deliver sweeping chorus's that the production wanted to reach and always relying on the melodramatics of Robert Smith's vocals, saw its popularity ascend with its somber appeal to disenfranchment, the best idea for any band who is interested in selling music to 13 year olds. "Boys don't cry" resurfaced in its puerility. What was called simplicity in this song was privileging a lachrymose personality for the sake of its own self. "Lovesong" made it chic to over exaggerate the idea of love to aggrandized proportions, to the point of fictionally creating problems out of thin air for children to pretend the most basic of romantic tragedy's to. All in all, the image of The Cure monstrously trumped any listening experience which was devoid of a strong sense melody and any sense of artistic restraint. In the age of expressionism ("express yourself"!) The Cure could find it's way to fame by having big hair and playing songs mostly in minor keys, and when a song was played in major, like "Just Like Heaven", the children would jump up and down on their beds in their lovesick personality's that required no effort, no responsibility, no sense of magnanimity, in other words, the definition of modern love as being childish.
|
|
|
> |